Diddy’s lawyers say sex acts distorted by ’puritanical’ prosecution
Published Jan 14, 2025 • 2 minute read
Join the conversation
FILE - Sean "Diddy" Combs arrives at the LA Premiere of "The Four: Battle For Stardom" at the CBS Radford Studio Center, May 30, 2018, in Los Angeles. Photo by Willy Sanjuan /Willy Sanjuan/Invision/AP
Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page.
NEW YORK — Lawyers for Sean “Diddy” Combs labelled the prosecution against the hip-hop star as “sexist and puritanical” on Tuesday, saying nine recordings of sex acts considered important evidence in the case show only consensual sex between willing adults.
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Don't have an account? Create Account
or
View more offers
Article content
Article content
Article content
The lawyers submitted a letter to a Manhattan federal court judge asking that the recordings of elaborate sex performances that authorities say Combs orchestrated be turned over to defence lawyers for additional investigation. So far, they say, defence lawyers have only been allowed to temporarily view them twice in the last two months.
Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking charges lodged against him after his September arrest. He has remained incarcerated, awaiting a May 5 trial, after bail was rejected following bail hearings before three different judges.
A spokesperson for prosecutors declined to comment.
The defence submission Tuesday was similar to arguments at bail hearings where defence lawyers insisted that prosecutors had demonized sexual activity between consenting adults to create the case.
Your Midday Sun
Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Your Midday Sun will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Recommended from Editorial
Jailed rap mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs hit with lawsuit alleging rape of girl, 16
Sean 'Diddy' Combs 'throwing tantrums' over Luigi Mangione's celebrity status behind bars
“Any fair-minded viewer of the videos will quickly conclude that the prosecution of Mr. Combs is both sexist and puritanical,” the lawyers wrote. “It is sexist because the government’s theory perpetuates stereotypes of female victimhood and lack of agency.”
The indictment against Combs said the music mogul arranged sexual encounters between his victims and male sex workers that he called “freak offs” — defined in the indictment as “elaborate and produced sex performances that Combs arranged, directed, masturbated during, and often electronically recorded.”
Advertisement 4
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Prosecutors said the encounters sometimes lasted days and involved multiple commercial sex workers, with Combs drugging participants to “keep the victims obedient and compliant.” They said raids of Combs’ Los Angeles and Miami homes produced supplies for the “freak offs,” including drugs and over 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant.
Defence lawyers say the nine videos “depicting six unambiguously consensual sexual encounters” were provided to the government by lawyers for a woman identified in the indictment as “Victim-1,” who was in a long-term relationship with Combs.
“In all six of these encounters,” defence attorneys wrote, “Victim-1 is not only consenting; she is evidently happy, dominant, and completely in control.”
Advertisement 5
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
RECOMMENDED VIDEO
We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, ortap here to see other videos from our team.
They said the videos do not depict sex parties and there were no secret cameras, orgies, minors or other celebrities involved.
They wrote that there was no evidence of violence, coercion, threats, or manipulation and no indication that anyone was incapacitated or under the influence of drugs or excessive alcohol consumption.
“There is certainly no evidence of sex trafficking,” they said.
The lawyers said the lighting on some videos was “very bad” and the images were “quite dark and grainy,” requiring experts to enhance the quality of the audio and video and analyze metadata to determine when the videos were created or modified.
They said the government’s view depends on the characterization of the sex performances as “dirty, disgusting, or inherently unsavoury” and shows that the government “seeks to police non-conforming sexual activity and that it assumes — despite all evidence to the contrary — that a woman’s willing participation must have been coerced.”
Article content
Share this article in your social network