)
Brian Austin Green calls out MGK as Megan Fox's due date approaches
Megan Fox and MGK announced the pregnancy in November
Read more >> : Cick here
 |
 |
 |
 |
&description=Brian Austin Green calls out MGK as Megan Fox's due date approaches Megan Fox and MGK announced the pregnancy in November %23meganfox) |
 |
 |
Superman Movie Lawsuit Explained: Why The Creator's Estate Is Suing Warner Bros. Discovery & DC Comics And What It Means
Superman is jeopardized by an old rights issue.
Click Here to read in detail
In a dramatic legal turn, the estate of Joseph Shuster â the co-creator of Superman â has launched a lawsuit against Warner Bros. Discovery and DC Comics. This legal challenge questions decades of corporate control over the Man of Steel and raises pressing issues over profit sharing and creative ownership. With Superman standing as one of the most recognizable icons in popular culture, this lawsuit not only revisits historical grievances but also threatens the DCUâs future and the release of Superman (2025) in certain territories.
Superman was born in 1938 from the creative minds of Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster. Debuting in Action Comics #1, Superman originated in the precursor to DC Comics, Detective Comics Inc. Superman quickly became the most iconic superhero in the world and a primary player in the DCU timeline, leading to decades of comics, movies, and television series. Much of the legal issues surrounding Superman relate to Siegel and Shuster not receiving fair restitution for their creation, which has since spawned into a multi-million dollar franchise.
Complex Copyright Laws Have Opened A New Avenue For Shusterâs EstateJoe Shusterâs estate filed suit on January 31, 2025, for the rights to Superman (via Deadline). At the heart of this lawsuit is foreign copyright law. In jurisdictions based on UK law, (including Canada, Australia, Ireland, and the UK), copyright laws contain provisions that automatically terminate previous agreements 25 years after the authorâs death. As Shuster died in 1992 and Siegel in 1996, the copyright in these territories reverted to Seigel's and Shusterâs estates in 2017 and 2021 respectively.
This brings into question all Superman media released in these countries after 2017 and jeopardizes the release of Superman (2025). As the lawsuit explains:
ââŚDefendants continue to exploit Superman across these jurisdictions without the Shuster Estateâs authorizationâincluding in motion pictures, television series, and merchandiseâin direct contravention of these countriesâ copyright laws, which require the consent of all joint copyright owners to do so.â
The Shuster estate is pushing for a jury trial, but, in the meantime, has also asked the judge for a cease-and-desist order regarding new Superman projects until the lawsuit is resolved. This jeopardizes the DCU's Superman (2025), which is due to be released internationally on July 9. A Warner Bros. Discovery spokesperson gave that statement: âWe fundamentally disagree with the merits of the lawsuit, and will vigorously defend our rights.â
The lawsuit hinges on the idea that modern legal interpretations of copyright laws could supersede older contracts. In jurisdictions where the law mandates a reversion of rights, the Shuster estate contends that Warner Bros. Discoveryâs continued commercial exploitation of Superman should legally entitle the estate to a share of the profits â and perhaps even partial creative control. While the estate is pursuing a reallocation of revenue from recent film releases, they are also seeking a broader reassessment of the characterâs ownership moving forward.
The History Of Superman's Movie Rights And Previous Lawsuits ExplainedSuperman Has Been Subject To Many LawsuitsMuch of this new Superman lawsuit is based on the characterâs previous rights issues. When they first created the character, Siegel and Shuster sold the original story and its copyrights to Detective Comics Inc for just $130 in 1938. As the hero bloomed into the biggest comic book character ever made, the pair began to resent this paltry sum and engaged in several campaigns to gain a more fitting payment.
It's worth noting here that this was common practice in the comic book industry, and Siegel and Shuster had done the same with numerous other properties. Moreover, the pair still worked and wrote for DC Comics on a very reasonable salary as two of its top creatives. Nevertheless, issues began when it became obvious that Superman was going to make DC a lot of money.
RelatedIâm Convinced David Corenswetâs Superman Can Beat The Best Part Of Henry Cavillâs Man Of Steel After The New DCU Trailer (But It Will Be Hard)After a new Superman movie trailer showed more of David Corenswet's DC hero, the DCU might surpass the best aspect of Henry Cavill's Superman.
The first legal case began in 1947 when DC published a story depicting Superboy, a character based on an old Siegel script. As Superboyâs rights had never been sold, courts ruled in favor of the pair. However, the court also ruled that DC Comics owned the rights to Superman. Siegel and Shuster settled out of court, with DC paying $94,013.16 (equivalent to $1,192,222 in 2023) for the rights to both characters. Both were fired by DC shortly after.
Throughout the 1940s and 1950s, Seigel was very vocal about his displeasure with DC Comics. A matter compounded by the copyright infringement case against Captain Marvel/Shazam. Captain Marvel originated as a Superman knock-off in Fawcett Comics, whom DC were suing. In the process, Fawcett Comics repeatedly subpoenaed Seigel, despite him having no more ownership of Superman. Much of this was captured in a series of poison pen letters penned by Seigel (via Bleeding Cool).
Perhaps by way of recompense, DC rehired Seigel in 1959, and he continued writing Superman stories until 1965. That year, the pair mounted their next attempt to regain the rights to Superman using the renewal option in the Copyright Act of 1909. This failed, with courts ruling the rights were legitimately sold in 1938. Seigel was fired again in 1966. Shortly thereafter, DC Comics was bought by Warner Bros. Discovery, during which they acquired the movie rights to all DC characters.
In 1975, Seigel and numerous other industry professionals began a campaign around giving artists and writers a more fair compensation system. With media pressure mounting, Warner Brothers agreed to give Siegel and Shuster a yearly stipend, full medical benefits, and credit their names in all future Superman productions in exchange for never contesting ownership of Superman. The pair agreed, and it seemed the saga was over.
After Shuster died in 1992, his family was offered the same annual benefits as he enjoyed. Seigelâs family, on the other hand, sought to reclaim the Superman rights after his death in 1996. Warner and DC Comics once again negotiated and agreed in 2001 that it would pay the Siegel heirs several million dollars and a yearly stipend of $500,000 in exchange for permanently granting the rights to Superman.
Then, in the early 2000s, both families attempted to gain the rights again. In 2003, Shusterâs heirs filed a termination notice for their half of Supermanâs copyright. While in 2004, Seigelâs family sued DC/Warner. While the judge initially ruled in favor of Seigel, the appeals court determined that the 2001 agreement was legally binding. As was the 1992 deal with the Shuster family. Now, in 2025, new developments have given the Shuster family another potential avenue.
How The Superman Lawsuit Could Affect The Release Of James Gunn's DC MovieSuperman Is Due To Release In 2025Image via Warner Bros.
One of the immediate concerns for Warner Bros. is the potential impact of this lawsuit on the release schedule of James Gunnâs upcoming DC film. Although the lawsuit centers on international copyright issues, its timing could complicate the filmâs distribution in regions where the disputed laws apply. While the United States and other major markets are expected to remain unaffected, smaller territories that adhere strictly to the reversion rules might experience delays or altered release strategies.
RelatedDavid Corenswet Convincing James Gunn The Superman Costume Should Include Trunks Even If They're A Little Silly Is Proof That He Was The Perfect Choice For The New Man Of SteelSupermanâs trunks may be divisive, but they play a crucial role in his mission. The DCUâs David Corenswet has proven he understands this perfectly.
Much of the fallout will depend on how quickly DC settles the lawsuit. However, itâs very possible that DC will proceed with the planned release, assuming that it will be resolved in time. The company might also not put too much stock into the lawsuit itself. Indeed, the the case contradicts the numerous agreements made over the years to give DC the sole rights to Superman. As such, this latest Superman row will likely follow a similar trajectory.
Sources: Deadline, Bleeding Cool
Superman Release Date July 11, 2025 Director James Gunn Writers James Gunn, Jerry Siegel, Joe Shuster Producers Lars P. Winther, Peter Safran Franchise(s) DCU Upcoming DC Movie Releases Superman Release Date July 11, 2025 Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow Release Date June 26, 2026 The Batman Part II Release Date October 1, 2027
 â the husband of late actress Barbie Hsuâare causing immense concern among the public.  %23barbiehsu)
