Netflix adds 'TikTok generation' thriller that kept fans 'on edge for two hours'
A film that was highly acclaimed upon its release in 2023 is now available to stream on Netflix.
Read more >> : Cick here
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The 215-minute, Oscar-tipped epic that could save Hollywood â if we let it
Brady Corbetâ??s â??The Brutalistâ?? is a defiant, distinctive masterpiece at loggerheads with conventional film industry wisdom. And, just like Francis Ford Coppolaâ??s maddening self-funded â??Megalopolisâ?? last year, itâ??s a nod to a far more interesting kind of American filmmaking, writes Xan Brooks
Click Here to read in detail
Sign up to our free IndyArts newsletter for all the latest entertainment news and reviews Sign up to our free IndyArts newsletter Sign up to our free IndyArts newsletter
I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy policy
Thereâs nothing Hollywood likes better than a bumptious young director with talent to burn â at least until the world turns and puts them out of business. This yearâs model is 36-year-old Brady Corbet, whose new film, The Brutalist, a 215-minute period epic shot on defunct film stock, has become the unlikely frontrunner in the 2025 Oscar race.
Corbetâs a relatively fresh face, only three features into his directing career. But heâs also a throwback, or a holdout, an old-school independent filmmaker following in the footsteps of his idols. Critics compare him to the auteurs of Seventies American cinema, some of whom are inconveniently still alive and making movies of their own.
Corbet, letâs assume, is aware that success has a shelf life and that every good work of art is just a shuffle step from disaster. The Brutalist, after all, is a film about artistic struggle, casting Adrien Brody as driven, brilliant Laszlo Toth, who wants to build a modernist masterpiece on a Pennsylvania hilltop. Officially speaking, Laszlo Toth is a Hungarian-born architect, just off the boat in 1950s America. But he could just as easily be a struggling filmmaker from modern-day Brooklyn. The Brutalist invites us to feel his pain as he tangles with his backers, stays true to his vision and tests the patience of his otherwise doting wife. âPromise me you wonât let it drive you mad,â she pleads.
Corbet, perhaps tellingly, co-wrote The Brutalist with his own wife, Mona Fastvold, and admits that the filmâs troubled journey to the screen drove him right to the edge. Seven years in the making, Corbetâs epic finally went before the cameras in Hungary so as to capitalise on the countryâs tax breaks. It was cobbled together for a little under $10m (£8m) and was predominantly shot in VistaVision, an antique film stock that hadnât been used since the early 1960s. The director recalls being told that the film was a folly and was going to end his career, so heâs entitled to feel vindicated and to bask in his success. Most critics agree: The Brutalist is a tour de force; an expansive, richly textured saga of the post-war immigrant experience. It has been likened to Sergio Leoneâs Once Upon a Time in America and Francis Ford Coppolaâs The Godfather Part II.
Leone died in 1989 and has safely passed into legend. Coppola, though, remains very much last yearâs model; a man gone up-river like Colonel Kurtz out of Apocalypse Now. Heâs merrily burnt all his bridges, is making films for his own amusement (when heâs able to make them at all) and represents the logical final stage for any self-respecting auteur. Last yearâs Megalopolis, Coppolaâs first feature since 2011, could almost be The Brutalistâs wealthier cousin â itâs a long, lush movie about a visionary architect (this time played by Adam Driver) who is determined to make his masterpiece and likewise has to battle a corrupt east coast establishment.
Except that where Corbet made his film for peanuts, Coppola self-funded Megalopolis to the tune of $120m (£98m), raising the money from the sale of his vineyards. And where The Brutalistâs shoot was defined by bustling, belt-tightened business, the Megalopolis set was reportedly one of chaos and waste, with the director accused of smoking marijuana while working and ordering young female extras to sit on his lap (both charges he denies). The Brutalist premiered with little fanfare and then gained momentum as the rave reviews mounted up. Megalopolis, by contrast, shot itself in the foot with an advertising campaign that relied on fabricated, AI-generated pull quotes, together with a five-star review on the film cataloguing site Letterboxd which was posted by Coppola himself.
Unlikely Oscar frontrunner: Adrien Brody in Brady Corbetâs âThe Brutalistâ (A24 )Years from now an enterprising film professor might build a college module around these two films, showing the right and wrong way to make an independent arthouse picture. They may conclude that The Brutalist was a hit (assuming it triumphs at the Oscars and box office predictions play out) and that Megalopolis flopped (current worldwide gross: $14m). They could then go on to compare Corbetâs discipline with Coppolaâs wayward free-style indulgence, proving by any reasonable measure that The Brutalist is the more successful and satisfying production. And yet the truth is that I love both these movies â or rather, what I love is the fact that they exist in the world. Megalopolis and The Brutalist feel personal, distinctive and defiantly at loggerheads with conventional industry wisdom. The fact that one beat the odds justifies the existence of the other.
Does this automatically make them auteur films, the singular works of inimitable artists? I suppose that it does, insofar as the auteur theory means anything any more (itâs almost as degraded as that VistaVision film stock). Yet whatâs interesting about The Brutalist and Megalopolis is that both films are fixated on this very subject. Theyâre fascinated by the vexed relationship between art and commerce and by the pursuit of excellence in a standardised modern world. Itâs no accident that the first film harks back to the 1950s and the second to the expressionistic silent era of Fritz Langâs Metropolis and Abel Ganceâs Napoleon. Corbet and Coppola, I suspect, are pining for the days when the concept of the great artist was still a recognised phenomenon, be it a monomaniacal architect or a Hollywood filmmaker with jodhpurs and a bullhorn.
Exasperating: Aubrey Plaza in Francis Ford Coppolaâs âMegalopolisâ (Entertainment Film Distributors)The auteur theory crested in the Sixties and Seventies and made heroes of a number of talented, distinctive directors, Coppola among them. Since then, itâs been a casualty of a changing business model, pushed to the sidelines by the ongoing fan service of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and the digital innovations of ChatGPT. Personal statements are out, mass entertainment is in and if the superstar director even exists any more, it is more likely to be found in Silicon Valley than Hollywood. Generative AI â amorphous and anonymous â is poised to turn the industry on its head. Handtooled human craft risks becoming obsolete. All of which makes Corbet and Coppola more precious than ever, like endangered red squirrels or a pair of Catholic monks working on their illuminated letters. Auteurs can be exasperating, hubristic and sometimes outright offensive. But we should protect them, preserve them, because whatâs coming is worse.
âThe Brutalistâ is in cinemas from 24 January
