The industry-changing blockbuster Pauline Kael hated
Pauline Kael never pulled her punches with movie reviews, but there was one movie that she despised because of its impact, not its merits as a film.
(Credits: Far Out / Rollins Maxwell)
Film » Cutting Room Floor
Thu 16 January 2025 2:30, UK
No critic had the influence that Pauline Kael did in the early 1970s. Bosley Crowther at The New York Times was a fading and increasingly outdated voice. Roger Ebert was only just starting out. At The New Yorker, Kael wielded the sharpest pen. Her reviews were so convincingly argued that they could have been used in court, and filmmakers trembled at the mere suggestion of her disapproval. More than four decades after she gave a dismissive review of Blade Runner, Ridley Scott is still so upset about it that he brings it up in almost every interview.
Kael was often very, very wrong about movies, dismissing everything from John Cassavetes’ A Woman Under the Influence to Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life. Then, there was her review of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, which is widely regarded as one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. In a spectacularly unequivocal takedown, Kael called it “a monumentally unimaginative movie.” You could get away with calling it unnecessarily opaque or languorous, but unimaginative is about as preposterous a claim as calling it visually inept (which she did not, thank goodness).
One of the films that Kael despised was Steven Spielberg’s groundbreaking 1975 blockbuster, Jaws. Rather than disliking it on its own merits, however, she disliked what it did to the industry. Speaking to The Guardian shortly before her death in 2001, Kael said, “A good movie brought in terrible consequences. Jaws is really a terrific movie.”
But, she explained, the film upended the industry by overshadowing the experimental efforts of directors like Francis Ford Coppola and Jean-Luc Godard and replacing them with big tentpole action movies.
“With Star Wars coming on top of it,” she continued, “That awful Star Wars and its successors, movies have just never been the same. There are hardly any small movies that people go to.”
More than two decades later, these comments are only more accurate. Jaws and Star Wars showed studios that they could be making a lot more money than they had been, even if films like The Godfather and Breathless wowed critics. Over time, there were even fewer mid-budget movies that made it through development, and the blockbuster movies became less and less imaginative.
While it’s always dangerous to look back and declare the past to be superior to the present, it is hard to deny that the early part of the 1970s was a highlight for cinema. As the studio system of Old Hollywood collapsed and a new generation of directors started pushing the boundaries of what movies could be, there was a brief moment when artistry and money were aligned.
It would be reductive to say that movies like Jaws and Star Wars were responsible for the seismic shift that followed, though. As brash auteurs like Coppola and William Friedkin earned a longer leash from the studios after their initial successes, they squandered the opportunity by throwing themselves into increasingly chaotic, lengthy, and financially disastrous projects. The combination of these factors conspired to bring us to a moment where repetitive franchises rule the industry.
In other words, we’ve reached the peak of “monumentally unimaginative” movies. Kael didn’t realise how good she had it.
Related Topics
JAWSPauline KaelSteven Spielberg